Opinion
Guest Post: AGOA presents U.S. President Barack Obama an opportunity to define his legacy in Africa
By Carlos Lopes and Kemal Dervis
Everyone stands to gain if Africa can sustain and accelerate its progress in tackling poverty and finding jobs for its growing young population.
The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) rarely makes headlines in the United States. But the frequency with which it was raised during President Barack Obama’s recent trip to Africa underlines how important it is.
De-legislation is seen on the continent both as a driver of progress and as a symbol of the US’s relations with it. The need to extend AGOA, due to expire in 2015, was a clear priority for the countries Obama visited.
It is easy to see why so much importance is attached to AGOA in Africa. The Act, which began operating in 2001, has succeeded in its goal of helping reduce poverty through increased trade and investment with the United States. Incomes have been raised and hundreds of thousands of jobs have been created, especially for women.
And while the biggest growth in trade has been in oil, AGOA has also helped strengthen and diversify economies. Lesotho and Kenya are among the nations which have seen the opportunities provided through AGOA and triggered crucial investment in new sectors and industries.
But while AGOA, which enables African countries that show progress towards a market-based economy to export a wide range of products to the US free of quotas or duty, is widely supported across the continent, it remains more controversial in the United States. Critics have warned that extending the Act beyond 2015 would damage America’s own interests and employment.
The Act’s opponents argue that Africa’s impressive growth in the 21st Century means the continent no longer needs special treatment. They also claim that it is China and other countries who have been investing in Africa which have been the main beneficiaries from the removal of restrictions and that, in some cases, they are simply re-exporting their own products through African countries.
Hard evidence, however, shows that while African countries have certainly gained, as intended, the most from AGOA, the benefits have not by any means been all one-way. In the first decade since it came into force, US exports to sub-Saharan Africa tripled to US$21 billion.
As the US commerce department estimates that 5,000 American jobs are created or sustained for every US$1 billion worth of exports, this trade is helping support over 100,000 jobs in the US. The US trade department has also insisted that proper safeguards are in place to prevent abuse of the rules. Such an outcome would lead to considerable trade losses for African economies. But that study found that if the US was to expand the range of products covered by AGOA, it would deliver huge benefits for the African countries and lead to higher diversification of African exports.
Nor, the research shows, would US producers and exporters suffer. On the contrary it would lead to increased American exports and jobs as African countries look to build up their own economies in new sectors. So it is to be welcomed that Obama, in response to African fears about the future of AGOA, made clear his determination during his trip to encourage Congress not just to renew the agreement post 2015, but to improve it.
We can only hope that his support for AGOA is taken into account during the upcoming 2013 US-Sub-Saharan Africa Trade and Economic Cooperation Forum in Addis Ababa. An enhanced Agoa would provide a powerful drive to deliver his African strategy set out a year ago and would demonstrate US global leadership for years to come.
Carlos Lopes is executive secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), while Kemal Dervis is vice president and director of Global Economy and Development at the Brookings Institution, and was formerly the head of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and Minister of Economic Affairs of Turkey